[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081023194924.GA10531@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:49:24 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Grant Grundler <grundler@...isc-linux.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci: show dma_mask bits in /sys
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 01:36:52PM -0600, Grant Grundler wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 08:39:23AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 12:44:12AM -0600, Grant Grundler wrote:
> > >
> > > Lastly, /sys seems to have over run even /proc. On an rx2600 (ia64):
> > > grundler@...prf3:/usr/src/linux-2.6$ find /sys ! -type d | wc
> > > 6288 6296 264893
> >
> > Is this causing some kind of problem for your systems?
>
> Nope. Just an observation on the "forest" (vs individual "trees").
>
> > /sys shows far more information than /proc does, so of course it would
> > be larger in quantity.
>
> Yes - and /sys is better organized (hierarchial in general).
> But it's getting harder to find stuff because there is so much now.
> Any comments on adding DMA attributes (e.g. dma_mask_bits) to /sys?
Sorry, wasn't paying attention. All I ask is that if you do add new
sysfs files, you document them in the proper format in
Documentation/ABI/
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists