[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081023201949.GA29258@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 22:19:49 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: wierd new config options
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 03:59:42PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >Why is UNEVICTABLE_LRU and option? Is there any rason to turn it off or
> >is this just to confuse users?
>
> Since the swapout code itself is already configurable with
> CONFIG_SWAP, I do believe we want to be able to config out
> the unevictable LRU code.
>
> I guess it could be argued that maybe CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU
> should just be folded into CONFIG_SWAP...
Sounds like a good plan.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists