linux-kernel - Re: wierd new config options

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 23 Oct 2008 22:19:49 +0200
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: wierd new config options

On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 03:59:42PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >Why is UNEVICTABLE_LRU and option?  Is there any rason to turn it off or
> >is this just to confuse users?
> 
> Since the swapout code itself is already configurable with
> CONFIG_SWAP, I do believe we want to be able to config out
> the unevictable LRU code.
> 
> I guess it could be argued that maybe CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU
> should just be folded into CONFIG_SWAP...

Sounds like a good plan.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/