[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4900E668.9050101@trash.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 23:02:32 +0200
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: michellammertink@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netlink: fix append of whole original message on negative
ack.
David Miller wrote:
> From: M Lammertink <michellammertink@...il.com>
> Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 20:17:51 +0200
>
>> Can anyone explain to me why struct nlmsgerr contains an int error and the nlmsghdr struct. The comment in netlink_ack states that the whole message should be appended. Why not only include an int error in struct nlmsgerr and just append the original message?
>>
>> Comments appreciated.
>>
>> diff -uprN linux-2.6.27.3.orig/net/netlink/af_netlink.c linux-2.6.27.3/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
>> --- linux-2.6.27.3.orig/net/netlink/af_netlink.c 2008-10-23 18:01:54.000000000 +0200
>> +++ linux-2.6.27.3/net/netlink/af_netlink.c 2008-10-23 18:04:22.000000000 +0200
>> @@ -1656,7 +1656,7 @@ void netlink_ack(struct sk_buff *in_skb,
>> }
>>
>> rep = __nlmsg_put(skb, NETLINK_CB(in_skb).pid, nlh->nlmsg_seq,
>> - NLMSG_ERROR, sizeof(struct nlmsgerr), 0);
>> + NLMSG_ERROR, payload, 0)
You can't include the full message since the resulting message
might exceed the 64k netlink limit.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists