| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20081023215003.GC1480@in.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 03:20:03 +0530
From: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Paul E McKenney <paulmck@...ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] timers: Handle HRTIMER_CB_IRQSAFE_UNLOCKED correctly from
softirq context
timers: Handle HRTIMER_CB_IRQSAFE_UNLOCKED correctly from softirq context
From: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>
While migrating the the CB_IRQSAFE_UNLOCKED timers during a cpu-offline,
we queue them on the cb_pending list, so that they won't go
stale.
Thus, when the callbacks of the timers run from the softirq context,
they could run into potential deadlocks, since these callbacks
assume that they're running with irq's disabled, thereby annoying
lockdep (see below)!
Fix this by emulating hardirq context while running these callbacks from
the hrtimer softirq.
=================================
[ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
2.6.27 #2
--------------------------------
inconsistent {in-hardirq-W} -> {hardirq-on-W} usage.
ksoftirqd/0/4 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE1:SE0] takes:
(&rq->lock){++..}, at: [<c011db84>] sched_rt_period_timer+0x9e/0x1fc
{in-hardirq-W} state was registered at:
[<c014103c>] __lock_acquire+0x549/0x121e
[<c0107890>] native_sched_clock+0x88/0x99
[<c013aa12>] clocksource_get_next+0x39/0x3f
[<c0139abc>] update_wall_time+0x616/0x7df
[<c0141d6b>] lock_acquire+0x5a/0x74
[<c0121724>] scheduler_tick+0x3a/0x18d
[<c047ed45>] _spin_lock+0x1c/0x45
[<c0121724>] scheduler_tick+0x3a/0x18d
[<c0121724>] scheduler_tick+0x3a/0x18d
[<c012c436>] update_process_times+0x3a/0x44
[<c013c044>] tick_periodic+0x63/0x6d
[<c013c062>] tick_handle_periodic+0x14/0x5e
[<c010568c>] timer_interrupt+0x44/0x4a
[<c0150c9f>] handle_IRQ_event+0x13/0x3d
[<c0151c14>] handle_level_irq+0x79/0xbd
[<c0105634>] do_IRQ+0x69/0x7d
[<c01041e4>] common_interrupt+0x28/0x30
[<c047007b>] aac_probe_one+0x1a3/0x3f3
[<c047ec2d>] _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x36/0x39
[<c01512b4>] setup_irq+0x1be/0x1f9
[<c065d70b>] start_kernel+0x259/0x2c5
[<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
irq event stamp: 50102
hardirqs last enabled at (50102): [<c047ebf4>] _spin_unlock_irq+0x20/0x23
hardirqs last disabled at (50101): [<c047edc2>] _spin_lock_irq+0xa/0x4b
softirqs last enabled at (50088): [<c0128ba6>] do_softirq+0x37/0x4d
softirqs last disabled at (50099): [<c0128ba6>] do_softirq+0x37/0x4d
other info that might help us debug this:
no locks held by ksoftirqd/0/4.
stack backtrace:
Pid: 4, comm: ksoftirqd/0 Not tainted 2.6.27 #2
[<c013f6cb>] print_usage_bug+0x13e/0x147
[<c013fef5>] mark_lock+0x493/0x797
[<c01410b1>] __lock_acquire+0x5be/0x121e
[<c0141d6b>] lock_acquire+0x5a/0x74
[<c011db84>] sched_rt_period_timer+0x9e/0x1fc
[<c047ed45>] _spin_lock+0x1c/0x45
[<c011db84>] sched_rt_period_timer+0x9e/0x1fc
[<c011db84>] sched_rt_period_timer+0x9e/0x1fc
[<c01210fd>] finish_task_switch+0x41/0xbd
[<c0107890>] native_sched_clock+0x88/0x99
[<c011dae6>] sched_rt_period_timer+0x0/0x1fc
[<c0136dda>] run_hrtimer_pending+0x54/0xe5
[<c011dae6>] sched_rt_period_timer+0x0/0x1fc
[<c0128afb>] __do_softirq+0x7b/0xef
[<c0128ba6>] do_softirq+0x37/0x4d
[<c0128c12>] ksoftirqd+0x56/0xc5
[<c0128bbc>] ksoftirqd+0x0/0xc5
[<c0134649>] kthread+0x38/0x5d
[<c0134611>] kthread+0x0/0x5d
[<c0104477>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
=======================
Signed-off-by: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
---
kernel/hrtimer.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++---
1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/hrtimer.c b/kernel/hrtimer.c
index cdec83e..60aaad6 100644
--- a/kernel/hrtimer.c
+++ b/kernel/hrtimer.c
@@ -1188,6 +1188,7 @@ static void run_hrtimer_pending(struct hrtimer_cpu_base *cpu_base)
enum hrtimer_restart (*fn)(struct hrtimer *);
struct hrtimer *timer;
int restart;
+ int emulate_hardirq_ctx = 0;
timer = list_entry(cpu_base->cb_pending.next,
struct hrtimer, cb_entry);
@@ -1196,12 +1197,26 @@ static void run_hrtimer_pending(struct hrtimer_cpu_base *cpu_base)
timer_stats_account_hrtimer(timer);
fn = timer->function;
+ /*
+ * A timer might have been added to the cb_pending list
+ * when it was migrated during a cpu-offline operation.
+ * Emulate hardirq context for such timers.
+ */
+ if (timer->cb_mode == HRTIMER_CB_IRQSAFE_PERCPU ||
+ timer->cb_mode == HRTIMER_CB_IRQSAFE_UNLOCKED)
+ emulate_hardirq_ctx = 1;
+
__remove_hrtimer(timer, timer->base, HRTIMER_STATE_CALLBACK, 0);
- spin_unlock_irq(&cpu_base->lock);
+ spin_unlock(&cpu_base->lock);
- restart = fn(timer);
+ if (likely(!emulate_hardirq_ctx)) {
+ local_irq_enable();
+ restart = fn(timer);
+ local_irq_disable();
+ } else
+ restart = fn(timer);
- spin_lock_irq(&cpu_base->lock);
+ spin_lock(&cpu_base->lock);
timer->state &= ~HRTIMER_STATE_CALLBACK;
if (restart == HRTIMER_RESTART) {
--
Thanks and Regards
gautham
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists