[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20081024085808J.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 08:57:41 +0900
From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
To: fenghua.yu@...el.com
Cc: a.beregalov@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tony.luck@...el.com, david.woodhouse@...el.com,
sfr@...b.auug.org.au, linux-next@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu,
fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp, adobriyan@...il.com
Subject: Re: build failure at x86/kernel/pci-dma.c with !CONFIG_PCI
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:51:00 -0700
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 04:09:52PM -0700, Alexander Beregalov wrote:
> > arch/x86/kernel/built-in.o: In function `iommu_setup':
> > pci-dma.c:(.init.text+0x36ad): undefined reference to `forbid_dac'
> > pci-dma.c:(.init.text+0x36cc): undefined reference to `forbid_dac'
> > pci-dma.c:(.init.text+0x3711): undefined reference to `forbid_dac
> >
> > commit 5b6985ce8ec7127b4d60ad450b64ca8b82748a3b
> > Author: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
> > Date: Thu Oct 16 18:02:32 2008 -0700
> >
> > intel-iommu: IA64 support
>
> Could you please try the following fix patch?
>
> Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
Looks fine to me.
For X86, there is no point to move forbid_dac from pci-dma.c.
For IA64, there is no point to have forbid_dac in
iommu_dma_supported(). IA64 doesn't even use it.
> ---
>
> arch/ia64/include/asm/iommu.h | 1 -
> arch/ia64/kernel/pci-dma.c | 7 -------
> arch/x86/include/asm/iommu.h | 1 -
> arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> drivers/pci/pci.h | 0
> drivers/pci/quirks.c | 14 --------------
> 6 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/ia64/include/asm/iommu.h b/arch/ia64/include/asm/iommu.h
> index 5fb2bb9..0490794 100644
> --- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/iommu.h
> +++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/iommu.h
> @@ -11,6 +11,5 @@ extern int force_iommu, no_iommu;
> extern int iommu_detected;
> extern void iommu_dma_init(void);
> extern void machvec_init(const char *name);
> -extern int forbid_dac;
>
> #endif
> diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/pci-dma.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/pci-dma.c
> index 10a75b5..031abbf 100644
> --- a/arch/ia64/kernel/pci-dma.c
> +++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/pci-dma.c
> @@ -89,13 +89,6 @@ int iommu_dma_supported(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
> {
> struct dma_mapping_ops *ops = get_dma_ops(dev);
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PCI
> - if (mask > 0xffffffff && forbid_dac > 0) {
> - dev_info(dev, "Disallowing DAC for device\n");
> - return 0;
> - }
> -#endif
> -
> if (ops->dma_supported_op)
> return ops->dma_supported_op(dev, mask);
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c b/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c
> index 1972266..1926248 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c
> @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
> #include <asm/calgary.h>
> #include <asm/amd_iommu.h>
>
> +static int forbid_dac __read_mostly;
> +
> struct dma_mapping_ops *dma_ops;
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_ops);
>
> @@ -291,3 +293,17 @@ void pci_iommu_shutdown(void)
> }
> /* Must execute after PCI subsystem */
> fs_initcall(pci_iommu_init);
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI
> +/* Many VIA bridges seem to corrupt data for DAC. Disable it here */
> +
> +static __devinit void via_no_dac(struct pci_dev *dev)
> +{
> + if ((dev->class >> 8) == PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI && forbid_dac == 0) {
> + printk(KERN_INFO "PCI: VIA PCI bridge detected."
> + "Disabling DAC.\n");
> + forbid_dac = 1;
> + }
> +}
> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_ANY_ID, via_no_dac);
> +#endif
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.h b/drivers/pci/pci.h
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/quirks.c b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
> index 96cf8ec..bbf66ea 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/quirks.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
> @@ -43,20 +43,6 @@ static void __devinit quirk_mellanox_tavor(struct pci_dev *dev)
> DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_MELLANOX,PCI_DEVICE_ID_MELLANOX_TAVOR,quirk_mellanox_tavor);
> DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_MELLANOX,PCI_DEVICE_ID_MELLANOX_TAVOR_BRIDGE,quirk_mellanox_tavor);
>
> -/* Many VIA bridges seem to corrupt data for DAC. Disable it here */
> -int forbid_dac __read_mostly;
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(forbid_dac);
> -
> -static __devinit void via_no_dac(struct pci_dev *dev)
> -{
> - if ((dev->class >> 8) == PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI && forbid_dac == 0) {
> - dev_info(&dev->dev,
> - "VIA PCI bridge detected. Disabling DAC.\n");
> - forbid_dac = 1;
> - }
> -}
> -DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_ANY_ID, via_no_dac);
> -
> /* Deal with broken BIOS'es that neglect to enable passive release,
> which can cause problems in combination with the 82441FX/PPro MTRRs */
> static void quirk_passive_release(struct pci_dev *dev)
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/iommu.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/iommu.h
> index 2daaffc..9a118bf 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/iommu.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/iommu.h
> @@ -7,7 +7,6 @@ extern struct dma_mapping_ops nommu_dma_ops;
> extern int force_iommu, no_iommu;
> extern int iommu_detected;
> extern int dmar_disabled;
> -extern int forbid_dac;
>
> extern unsigned long iommu_nr_pages(unsigned long addr, unsigned long len);
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists