[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0810222244130.3010@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 22:49:26 -0400 (EDT)
From: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hiroshi Miura <miura@...cha.org>,
YOKOTA Hiroshi <yokota@...lab.is.tsukuba.ac.jp>,
Harald Welte <laforge@...monks.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/42] Staging: add pcc-acpi driver
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 02:37:18PM -0400, Len Brown wrote:
> > NAK.
> > this was already relplaced by the panasonic driver in the acpi tree.
>
> Is this in 2.6.27, or was it a 2.6.28 addition? For some reason, I had
> reports from openSUSE users that 2.6.27 still didn't work properly and
> needed this driver.
>
> How about the new "pcc-acpi-cdrom" driver hack? Hiroshi, is that needed
> still with the 2.6.27 kernel?
drivers/misc/panasonic-laptop.c is staged for 2.6.28:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6.git;a=history;f=drivers/misc/panasonic-laptop.c;h=a2cb598d8ab54a98000d1f31f7c2407924399a5e;hb=test
> > Greg,
> > If it has the word "acpi" in it, please check with me before
> > putting something in the staging tree, for I'd prefer to
> > stage such things in the acpi tree.
>
> Ok, I didn't know you wanted "uncleaned" drivers in your tree, I'll
> remember this for the future :)
AFAICK, the driver that was checked into staging tree
was based on an older version of the driver already staged
in the acpi tree. I think that the staging tree
isn't helping us in this scenario.
thanks,
-Len
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists