[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48FFFA15.8060603@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 13:14:13 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
CC: linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jeff@...zik.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] libata: get rid of ATA_MAX_QUEUE loop in ata_qc_complete_multiple()
Jens Axboe wrote:
> @@ -4811,16 +4811,19 @@ int ata_qc_complete_multiple(struct ata_port *ap, u32 qc_active)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - for (i = 0; i < ATA_MAX_QUEUE; i++) {
> + while (done_mask) {
> struct ata_queued_cmd *qc;
> + unsigned int next = __ffs(done_mask);
>
> - if (!(done_mask & (1 << i)))
> - continue;
> -
> - if ((qc = ata_qc_from_tag(ap, i))) {
> + qc = ata_qc_from_tag(ap, i + next);
> + if (qc) {
> ata_qc_complete(qc);
> nr_done++;
> }
> + if (++next >= ATA_MAX_QUEUE)
> + break;
> + i += next;
> + done_mask >>= next;
Shouldn't this be...
i += next + 1;
if (i >= ATA_MAX_QUEUE)
break;
or better...
while (done_mask) {
struct ata_queued_cmd *qc;
unsigned int next = __ffs(done_mask);
tag += next;
if ((qc = ata_qc_from_tag(ap, tag))) {
ata_qc_complete(qc);
nr_done++;
}
next++;
tag += next;
done_mask >>= next;
}
done_mask is guaranteed to be zero at when tag reaches ATA_MAX_QUEUE.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists