[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081024073212.GA4008@linux-sh.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:32:12 +0900
From: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Cc: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@...il.com>, tj@...nel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.27-rc1 (2fca5c): libata: kernel cant boot
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 09:24:29AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24 2008, Paul Mundt wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 09:13:29AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > Darn, this smells like a train wreck. I'm assuming this fixes it?
> > >
> > Yes, that fixes it.
>
> OK, that's pretty bad. 2.6.28-rc1 will not work on any box using libata
> with non-ncq disks. If you need me, I'll be at the bar.
>
At least you only missed -rc1 by a few hours, it was a good effort.. :-)
> From e598055dde1951c47c8b3522616f6ebff0ed9847 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
> Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 09:22:42 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] libata: fix bug with non-ncq devices
>
> The recent commit 201f1b98822078c808b5e2d379a6ddbfc0a06ee1 to enable
> support for block layer tagging in libata was broken for non-NCQ
> devices. The block layer initializes the tag field to -1 to detect
> invalid uses of a tag, and if the libata devices does NOT support
> NCQ, we just used that field to index the internal command list.
> So we need to check for -1 first and only use the tag field if
> it's valid.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Tested-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
Thanks for the quick fix! Now I can go back to hacking on the stuff I
was avoiding..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists