[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081024105132.GA8442@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:51:32 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, travis@....com,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Vitaly Mayatskikh <vmayatsk@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: do_boot_cpu can deadlock?
On 10/24, Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 11:33:42AM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> > But let's suppose we boot with maxcpus=1, and then bring up another CPU.
> > Or we really add the new physical CPU (I don't really know if this is
> > possible on x86).
>
> Even I am not sure if physical hotplug is possible.
>
> But think about the virtualization case when we want to add
> additional CPU to a KVM guest at runtime? This
> is not such a rare use-case. It could dead-lock that time, No?
virtualization/KVM is a black magic to me ;) I don't know how/if it is
possible to add CPU at runtime.
Anyway, booting with maxcpus=1 allows us to bring up another CPU later,
and idle_thread_array[cpu] == NULL in that case, yes?
Perhaps smp_prepare_cpus() can do fork_idle() for_each_possible_cpu() ?
Or we can change do_boot_cpu() to use kthread_run() to create the idle
thread.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists