[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4901BC16.4000002@sgi.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 05:14:14 -0700
From: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] SGI X86 UV: Provide a System Activity Indicator driver
Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Fri 2008-10-24 04:19:04, Mike Travis wrote:
>> [Ingo - could you let me know what's holding up this driver?
>> Thanks!, Mike]
>
> I thought that...
>
> > +static __init void uv_scir_register_cpu_notifier(void)
>> +{
>> + hotcpu_notifier(uv_scir_cpu_notify, 0);
>> + idle_notifier_register(&uv_idle_notifier);
>> +}
>
> ...Ingo said that idle_notifier_register is deprecated and going away?
>
> Pavel
Is there any other way to get an indication then? This is also in ia64 code
though not with the formality of a callback -- it's a static function pointer:
arch/ia64/kernel/process.c:
void (*ia64_mark_idle)(int);
arch/ia64/sn/kernel/setup.c:
ia64_mark_idle = &snidle;
arch/ia64/sn/kernel/idle.c
void snidle(int state)
{
if (state) {
if (pda->idle_flag == 0) {
/*
* Turn the activity LED off.
*/
set_led_bits(0, LED_CPU_ACTIVITY);
}
pda->idle_flag = 1;
} else {
/*
* Turn the activity LED on.
*/
set_led_bits(LED_CPU_ACTIVITY, LED_CPU_ACTIVITY);
pda->idle_flag = 0;
}
}
As I mentioned, I would be happy to use an alternative but I haven't yet found one.
Should I put the above into x86_64?
Thanks,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists