[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081024142315.GA6481@brain>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 15:23:15 +0100
From: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Handle space after for_each_* macros gracefully in
checkpatch
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 01:50:10PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Handle space after for_each_* macros gracefully in checkpatch.pl
>
> Anyone else seeing the irony of checkpatch.pl recommending to
> use for_each_cpu_mask, but then not actually parsing it
> correctly.
>
> When you write
>
> for_each_cpu_mask (...) {
>
> it would complain about the space between mask and the open bracket
> because it thinks it's a normal function call.
>
> Fix this in a generic way. In theory someone could construct
> a normal function that starts with for_each_* and it would
> not warn, but I think that would be uncommon. The alternative
> of listing all macros was tried first, but turned out to
> be unwieldly.
>
> I think I covered most of the common ones available, the
> only exceptions are a few oddballs with leading prefix
> like pnp_for_each* or zorro_for_each.
I am happy with this conceptually. However when this was suggested
before there was a concensus that that it was not obvious whether this
was meant to be written as a function or a control and nothing was done.
So if people are with you on this, I am happy.
-apw
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists