linux-kernel - Re: Oops in ACPI with git latest

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200810241104.19704.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Date:	Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:04:19 -0700
From:	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
To:	"Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@...el.com>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
	"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: Oops in ACPI with git latest

So who wants to send me a final patch for this?

Thanks,
Jesse

On Friday, October 24, 2008 7:57 am Moore, Robert wrote:
> Since acpi_evaluate_object doesn't set the pointer value, it may be simply
> random.
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:rjw@...k.pl]
> >Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 11:57 PM
> >To: James Bottomley; Jesse Barnes
> >Cc: Moore, Robert; linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel; Len Brown
> >Subject: Re: Oops in ACPI with git latest
> >
> >On Friday, 24 of October 2008, James Bottomley wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 15:34 -0700, Moore, Robert wrote:
> >> > +	if (!output.pointer)
> >> > +		return AE_NULL_OBJECT;
> >> > +
> >> >
> >> > This probably won't work. acpi_evaluate_object currently doesn't touch
> >
> >the pointer parameter if there is no return value, it only sets the length
> >to zero.
> >
> >> Actually, it does.
> >
> >Well, this was the only candidate for a NULL pointer dereference, so I'd
> > be surprised if it didn't. :-)
> >
> >> > So, you might try this:
> >> >
> >> > +	if (!output.length)
> >> > +		return AE_NULL_OBJECT;
> >> > +
> >
> >Still, I'd expect the AML interpreter to return error code in this case.
> >
> >> This also works.
> >
> >Why don't we make it extra safe, then. ;-)
> >
> >---
> >From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
> >Subject: Prevent acpi_osc_run from using NULL objects
> >
> >Check if the object returned by acpi_evaluate_object() in
> >acpi_run_osc() is not NULL.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
> >---
> > drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c |    3 +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> >Index: linux-2.6/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> >===================================================================
> >--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> >+++ linux-2.6/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> >@@ -83,6 +83,9 @@ static acpi_status acpi_run_osc(acpi_han
> > 	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> > 		return status;
> >
> >+	if (!output.pointer || !output.length)
> >+		return AE_NULL_OBJECT;
> >+
> > 	out_obj = output.pointer;
> > 	if (out_obj->type != ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER) {
> > 		printk(KERN_DEBUG "Evaluate _OSC returns wrong type\n");
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-- 
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/