[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081024192532.GG27492@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 21:25:32 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, akataria@...are.com,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Daniel Hecht <dhecht@...are.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Skip tsc synchronization checks if CONSTANT_TSC bit is set.
> BIOSes are also just software, and we have to deal with bugs in them
> *all the time*. The reality is that we're going to have to deal with
> both vendor and user reluctance to upgrade, and therefore have to deal
> with brokenness in the field.
In the field they will just continue using clock=pit, like they
always did on vmware. And also they will not update the Linux kernel.
This is strictly for new installations. And I frankly don't
see why Linux needs to get white listed workarounds when the
Hypervisor couldn't as well be fixed. We have the bizarre
situation here where a HV vendor tries to add workarounds
to Linux instead of fixing it on their products.
Now making generic code a little more flexible in what
it accepts is fine though (like relaxing tsc_sync or
checking and trusting UNSTABLE_TSC). That will scale at least
and doesn't need significant new code.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists