linux-kernel - Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 25 Oct 2008 00:25:34 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Evgeniy Polyakov <s0mbre@...rvice.net.ru>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Subject: Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen.

On Friday, 10 of October 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Evgeniy Polyakov <s0mbre@...rvice.net.ru> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 01:42:45PM +0200, Ingo Molnar (mingo@...e.hu) wrote:
> > > > vanilla 27: 347.222
> > > > no TSO/GSO: 357.331
> > > > no hrticks: 382.983
> > > > no balance: 389.802
> > > 
> > > okay. The target is 470 MB/sec, right? (Assuming the workload is sane 
> > > and 'fixing' it does not mean we have to schedule worse.)
> > 
> > Well, that's where I started/stopped, so maybe we will even move
> > further? :)
> 
> that's the right attitude ;)

Can anyone please tell me if there was any conclusion of this thread?

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/