[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081024225121.GA19759@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 00:51:21 +0200
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, alistair@...zero.co.uk, rjw@...k.pl,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.28-rc1
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 03:31:39PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
> Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 08:17:53 -0700 (PDT)
>
> > Now, _another_ part (and arguably the really core reason) of this problem
> > is that our Makefile rules for the asm include directory is weak and
> > unreliable in the presense of already-existing unexpected entries.
>
> I guess we could use seperate "stamp" files to deal with this.
>
> Along with the generated file "foo" there is a "foo.stamp" file
> that is generated with "touch" after "foo" is built.
I remember I made an attempt doing so long time ago for
the asm symlink. But why it failed for me I dunno.
We used this trick in many archs before
but as part of the header move to arch/$ARCH we have killed
almost all uses of symlink to reach certain files.
The asm symlink is only used by asm-offsett.h for most archs these
days and when I get around to it I will fix that too so we
can kill it entirely.
But first we need to move all archs headers to arch/$ARCH.
And we are getting there.
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists