[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49033E1B.9030406@skyrush.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 09:41:15 -0600
From: Joe Peterson <joe@...rush.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] n-tty-output-bells-immediately
Alan Cox wrote:
> Ok without randomly hitting send this time...
>
> LC/UC and control characters looks right. (except the added white space)
> Buffer sizing looks fine
> Bell definitely a good idea
>
> Those three applied with better subject lines and queued for .29
>
> The last one I'm rather less happy with but want to ponder a bit more the
> best way to handle.
All sounds good - thanks. Yes, let's think a bit more about the last
one. The problem, as I see it now, is that only the ldisc knows how to
treat certain chars, but the input buffers get clogged before they get
to the ldisc. Perhaps devising a way for upstream input code to call
the ldisc to inform it that there is a "signal pending/queued" (i.e.
SIGINT, SIGQUIT, SIGSTP) or a tty restart (e.g. ^Q) queued...
BTW, where are the patches sitting at this point? I saw an email about
"linux-next" that lists just the first of the 3 (the drop bkl one); and
your tty git is now empty. Just curious.
Thanks! Joe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists