linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] User namespaces: set of cleanups (v2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 25 Oct 2008 13:08:51 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, jmorris@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] User namespaces: set of cleanups (v2)

Hi David,

On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 19:44:01 +0100 David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Serge E. Hallyn <serue@...ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > I've just tested with David's plain creds-v3 tree
> 
> Note the creds-v4 branch is now current.  Is it worth me replacing that with a
> tree that just has a master branch to simplify things?

It would be good if you could have a "next" (or "creds-next" or
something) branch in your tree and I can fetch that (that way I don't
have to keep updating my configs).  It is OK if thet branch rebases and
may just be an alias for another branch (or a subset if you have
experimental stuff in there.  Remember "posted, reviewed, tested before
it is in linux-next".

Thanks.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped