[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20081025130851.379cfac0.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 13:08:51 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, jmorris@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] User namespaces: set of cleanups (v2)
Hi David,
On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 19:44:01 +0100 David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Serge E. Hallyn <serue@...ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > I've just tested with David's plain creds-v3 tree
>
> Note the creds-v4 branch is now current. Is it worth me replacing that with a
> tree that just has a master branch to simplify things?
It would be good if you could have a "next" (or "creds-next" or
something) branch in your tree and I can fetch that (that way I don't
have to keep updating my configs). It is OK if thet branch rebases and
may just be an alias for another branch (or a subset if you have
experimental stuff in there. Remember "posted, reviewed, tested before
it is in linux-next".
Thanks.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists