linux-kernel - Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1224914333.3822.18.camel@marge.simson.net>
Date:	Sat, 25 Oct 2008 07:58:53 +0200
From:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	rjw@...k.pl, mingo@...e.hu, s0mbre@...rvice.net.ru,
	a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen.

On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 22:16 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
> Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 05:37:28 +0200
> 
> > Part of the .27 regression was added scheduler overhead going from .26
> > to .27.  The scheduler overhead is now gone, but an unidentified source
> > of localhost throughput loss remains for both SMP and UP configs.
> 
> It has to be the TSO thinky Evgeniy hit too right?

Dunno.

> If not, please bisect this.

(oh my <fword> gawd:)

I spent long day manweeks trying to bisect and whatnot.  It's immune to
my feeble efforts, and my git-foo.

	-Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/