[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2f11576a0810260637q21eaec62q4e2662742541e771@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 22:37:50 +0900
From: "KOSAKI Motohiro" <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: "Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: "Heiko Carstens" <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
"Nick Piggin" <npiggin@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Hugh Dickins" <hugh@...itas.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Rik van Riel" <riel@...hat.com>,
"Lee Schermerhorn" <lee.schermerhorn@...com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
"Christoph Lameter" <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Gautham Shenoy" <ego@...ibm.com>,
"Oleg Nesterov" <oleg@...sign.ru>,
"Rusty Russell" <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] lru_add_drain_all() don't use schedule_on_each_cpu()
Hi Peter,
>> @@ -611,4 +613,8 @@ void __init swap_setup(void)
>> #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
>> hotcpu_notifier(cpu_swap_callback, 0);
>> #endif
>> +
>> + vm_wq = create_workqueue("vm_work");
>> + BUG_ON(!vm_wq);
>> +
>> }
>
> While I really hate adding yet another per-cpu thread for this, I don't
> see another way out atm.
Can I ask the reason of your hate?
if I don't know it, making improvement patch is very difficult to me.
> Oleg, Rusty, ego, you lot were discussing a similar extra per-cpu
> workqueue, can we merge these two?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists