[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <11588.1225037095@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 16:04:55 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, jmorris@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] User namespaces: set of cleanups (v2)
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Yes. Or whatever it is based on now if that merges OK with Linus' head
> (try a test merge). Just don't base on linux-next :-)
It's based on Linus's head at the moment, give or take the last few bits he
pulled in which I haven't dealt with yet.
> What I want is exactly what you will ask/have asked Linus to fetch but
> without the branch name changing .. I care more about the name changing
> than the contents changing.
>
> So .. what branch do I fetch tomorrow? (Hint: if you have your version
> for Linus checked out then type "git branch next" and reply to this email
> saying "next" :-))
I asked him to pull creds-v4 last:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/dhowells/cred-2.6.git;a=shortlog;h=creds-v4
I'd quite like to amend the name of the branch to something more sensible,
since the 'v<N>' represented new versions based on fixing up merges with
Linus's tree rather than changing my patches.
However, if you'd rather I just threw new merges on top of that, then I can do
that - it's just got a silly branch name.
Alternatively, if you'd rather James pulled it into his 'next' branch, he
might be amenable to that.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists