[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081026183412.GX26094@parisc-linux.org>
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 12:34:13 -0600
From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
To: Yu Zhao <yu.zhao@...scape.net>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
greg@...ah.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci: Fixing drivers/pci/search.c compilation warning.
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 08:51:25PM +0800, Yu Zhao wrote:
> This reminds me of other problems of PCI search functions.
>
> The 'dev_start' is passed to bus_find_device(), and its 'knode_bus'
> reference count is decreased by klist_iter_init_node() in that function.
> The problem is the reference count may be already decrease to 0 because
> the PCI device 'from' is hot-plugged off (e.g., pci_remove_bus) when the
> search goes. A warning is fired when klist_iter_init_node() detects the
> reference count becomes 0.
>
> Some code uses pci_find_device() in a way that is not safe with the
> hotplug, because a device may be destroyed after bus_find_device()
> returns it and before it's held by pci_dev_get() in the next round.
> Following is an example from a random grep:
Yes, that's why pci_find_device() is deprecated. But it doesn't also
need to be buggy ;-)
--
Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists