[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1225016599.5403.15.camel@marge.simson.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 11:23:19 +0100
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, rjw@...k.pl,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, s0mbre@...rvice.net.ru,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen.
On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 02:11 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Was this when we decreased the default value of
> /proc/sys/vm/dirty_ratio, perhaps? dbench is sensitive to that.
Wow, indeed. I fired up an ext2 disk to take kjournald out of the
picture (dunno, just a transient thought). Stock settings produced
three perma-wrecks in a row. With it bumped to 50, three very
considerably nicer results in a row appeared.
2.6.26.7-smp dirty_ratio = 10 (stock)
Throughput 36.3649 MB/sec 160 procs
Throughput 47.0787 MB/sec 160 procs
Throughput 88.2055 MB/sec 160 procs
2.6.26.7-smp dirty_ratio = 50
Throughput 1009.98 MB/sec 160 procs
Throughput 1101.57 MB/sec 160 procs
Throughput 943.205 MB/sec 160 procs
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists