[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1225099757.9642.2.camel@marge.simson.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 10:29:17 +0100
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, rjw@...k.pl,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, s0mbre@...rvice.net.ru,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen.
On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 20:03 +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Oct 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > > > > 208.4 MB/sec -- vanilla 2.6.16.60
> > > > > 201.6 MB/sec -- vanilla 2.6.20.1
> > > > > 172.9 MB/sec -- vanilla 2.6.22.19
> > > > > 74.2 MB/sec -- vanilla 2.6.23
> > > > > 46.1 MB/sec -- vanilla 2.6.24.2
> > > > > 30.6 MB/sec -- vanilla 2.6.26.1
> > > > > I.e. huge drop for 2.6.23 (this was with default configs for each
> > > > > respective kernel).
> > Was this when we decreased the default value of
> > /proc/sys/vm/dirty_ratio, perhaps? dbench is sensitive to that.
>
> 2.6.28 gives 41.8 MB/s with /proc/sys/vm/dirty_ratio == 50. So small
> improvement, but still far far away from the throughput of pre-2.6.23
> kernels.
How many clients?
dbench 160 -t 60
2.6.28-smp (git.today)
Throughput 331.718 MB/sec 160 procs (no logjam)
Throughput 309.85 MB/sec 160 procs (contains logjam)
Throughput 392.746 MB/sec 160 procs (contains logjam)
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists