[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20081027101703.e954071d.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 10:17:03 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: "Paul Menage" <menage@...gle.com>
Cc: bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Srivatsa Vaddagiri" <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add hierarchical accounting to cpu accounting
controller
On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 08:38:52 -0700
"Paul Menage" <menage@...gle.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 11:01 PM, Bharata B Rao
> <bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > Reported-by: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
>
> So in technical terms this patch looks fine now. There's still the
> question of whether it's OK to change the existing API, since it's
> been in the kernel in its currently (non-hierarchical) form for
> several releases now.
>
Hmm..how about having 2 params as "aggregated usage" and "private usage" ?
cpuacct.usage.
cpuacct.all_subtree_usage.
heavy ?
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists