[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4905193D.90607@vc.cvut.cz>
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 18:28:29 -0700
From: Petr Vandrovec <vandrove@...cvut.cz>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
CC: Elias Oltmanns <eo@...ensachen.de>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@...il.com>, tj@...nel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.27-rc1 (2fca5c): libata: kernel cant boot
Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 25 2008, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 25 2008, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
>>> Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Oct 24 2008, Elias Oltmanns wrote:
>>>>> Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com> wrote:
>>>>> >From e598055dde1951c47c8b3522616f6ebff0ed9847 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>>>>> From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
>>>>>> Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 09:22:42 +0200
>>>>>> Subject: [PATCH] libata: fix bug with non-ncq devices
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The recent commit 201f1b98822078c808b5e2d379a6ddbfc0a06ee1 to enable
>>>>> Wouldn't that be commit 2fca5ccf97d2c28bcfce44f5b07d85e74e3cd18e?
>>>> Yes that is correct, the other commit is actually a private one in my
>>>> tree for other libata changes. Updated patch below, thanks for checking!
>>>>
>>> >From e598055dde1951c47c8b3522616f6ebff0ed9847 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>>> From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
>>>> Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 09:22:42 +0200
>>>> Subject: [PATCH] libata: fix bug with non-ncq devices
>>> Hello,
>>> this fixes my DVD, but unfortunately NCQ devices connected to PMP are
>>> still dead - apparently as soon as mount() tries to do serious I/O on
>>> the drive. Backing out both post-2.6.28-rc1 fix as well as your
>>> original change brings storage back. I suspect that problem is that
>>> with PMP same tag cannot be (should not be? must not be?) used on
>>> multiple devices behind PMP - and before your change tags were allocated
>>> per-port, while now they are allocated per-device.
>> That would indeed break, this requires allocating the tag map in the
>
> Totally untested, does this work?
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> index 4b95c43..0785c46 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> @@ -1107,6 +1107,10 @@ static int ata_scsi_dev_config(struct scsi_device *sdev,
>
> depth = min(sdev->host->can_queue, ata_id_queue_depth(dev->id));
> depth = min(ATA_MAX_QUEUE - 1, depth);
> +
> + if (dev->link->ap->pmp_link)
> + scsi_init_shared_tag_map(sdev->host, ATA_MAX_QUEUE - 1);
> +
> scsi_set_tag_type(sdev, MSG_SIMPLE_TAG);
> scsi_activate_tcq(sdev, depth);
> }
No. It went through same story as without patch - first it declared
drive #2 hung, after port reset drives #0,1,2 were declared hung, after
second port reset drive #2 was declared dead, after third port reset
drive #3 was hung, after fourth reset it said that /dev/sde changed
capacity from 0 to 1TB, and at that point I decided that it is time to
hit alt-sysrq-b to prevent damage...
Also I think that this change leaks memory a bit...
Petr
Petr
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists