[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081027152940.GA14567@sgi.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 10:29:40 -0500
From: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v3] SGI RTC: add RTC system interrupt
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 03:08:29PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com> wrote:
>
> > +void uv_rtc_timer_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs)
> > +{
> > + struct pt_regs *old_regs = set_irq_regs(regs);
> > +
> > + ack_APIC_irq();
> > +
> > + exit_idle();
> > +
> > + irq_enter();
> > +
> > + if (uv_rtc_interrupt_extension)
> > + uv_rtc_interrupt_extension();
> > +
> > + irq_exit();
> > +
> > + set_irq_regs(old_regs);
> > +}
>
> hm, the exit_idle() looks weird - why is it done? If we get an IRQ
> then the CPU will exit idle state anyway.
Ingo,
I'm not quite sure what you mean here. Are you referring to an explicit call to exit_idle() that is done somewhere else (such as do_IRQ())?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists