[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1225121592.5146.9.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 10:33:12 -0500
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@...erlog.com>,
Luciano Rocha <luciano@...otux.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
SCSI development list <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: usb hdd problems with 2.6.27.2
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 11:25 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
> > BTW a single disk in RAID 0 (seen on a HP E200 controller)
> > has a shortened capacity value seen in the midlevel on the
> > corresponding logical drive. That missing chunk is probably
> > where the RAID controller puts its control information.
> > Anyway, playing with the capacity value returned by READ
> > CAPACITY certainly has a precedent.
>
> usb-storage isn't in the business of altering the data it gets from a
> device. It's just a transport. That's why the sdev->fix_capacity flag
> exists; we tell the upper layer that the data it gets is going to be
> wrong and let the upper layer worry about fixing things up.
And you do this by setting US_FL_FIX_CAPACITY in unusual_devs.h
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists