[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9bd6b5360810271303teb198dejde3116f69cfffd46@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 04:03:52 +0800
From: sniper <s3c24xx@...il.com>
To: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] LOCKDEP: minor fix for debug_show_all_locks()
When we failed to get tasklist_lock eventually (count equals 0),
we should only print " ignoring it.\n", and not print
" locked it.\n" needlessly.
Signed-off-by: Qinghuang Feng <qhfeng.kernel@...il.com>
---
diff --git a/kernel/lockdep.c b/kernel/lockdep.c
index dbda475..12bf812 100644
--- a/kernel/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/lockdep.c
@@ -3417,10 +3417,12 @@ retry:
}
printk(" ignoring it.\n");
unlock = 0;
+ goto print_locks;
}
if (count != 10)
printk(" locked it.\n");
+print_locks:
do_each_thread(g, p) {
/*
* It's not reliable to print a task's held locks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists