linux-kernel - Re: [rtc-linux] [PATCH 2/2] rtc: rtc-wm8350: Add support for WM8350 RTC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200810271319.35256.david-b@pacbell.net>
Date:	Mon, 27 Oct 2008 13:19:34 -0700
From:	David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc:	Alessandro Zummo <alessandro.zummo@...ertech.it>,
	rtc-linux@...glegroups.com,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] [PATCH 2/2] rtc: rtc-wm8350: Add support for WM8350 RTC

On Monday 27 October 2008, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 01:03:21PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> > On Monday 27 October 2008, Alessandro Zummo wrote:
> > >  (and a detailed checklist at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist )
> 
> > Also:  rtc_ops.ioctl() method should only handle RTC_{AIE,UIE}_{ON,OFF},
> > since the other standard ioctls have rtc_ops equivalents.
> 
> > (This code is fine in both respects.  Though since I've received three
> > copies of the driver since it was merged to MM, maybe I missed something.)
> 
> Unfortunately I added the __devexit_p() annotation in response to
> Alessandro's comments.  I'll remove it again,

No, don't -- that's why I said "this code is fine..." !!

You're not using platform_driver_probe(), so it's appropriate to
use the __devexit() route.


> other than that all that's 
> changed is a tweak to the module description and Andrew's change to use
> schedule_timeout_uninterruptible().
> 
> How should these drivers be merged?

Andrew is the keeper of the RTC patch queue, so I suggest you issue
one patch against the two in MM:

	rtc-rtc-wm8350-add-support-for-wm8350-rtc.patch
	rtc-rtc-wm8350-add-support-for-wm8350-rtc-fix.patch

That would probably cause the least amount of extra work for Andrew.

- Dave

 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/