lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m3mygplli0.fsf@maximus.localdomain>
Date:	Mon, 27 Oct 2008 23:29:59 +0100
From:	Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
To:	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] r8169: revert "read MAC address from EEPROM on init"

[Reposting to lkml only, Gnus likes to eat quoting from email addresses
under specific circumstances and then vger doesn't pass them through]

Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com> writes:

> -static int rtl_eeprom_read(struct pci_dev *pdev, int cap, int addr, __le32 *val)
> -{
> -	int ret, count = 100;
> -	u16 status = 0;
> -	u32 value;
> -
> -	ret = pci_write_config_word(pdev, cap + PCI_VPD_ADDR, addr);
> -	if (ret < 0)
> -		return ret;
> -
> -	do {
> -		udelay(10);
> -		ret = pci_read_config_word(pdev, cap + PCI_VPD_ADDR, &status);
> -		if (ret < 0)
> -			return ret;
> -	} while (!(status & PCI_VPD_ADDR_F) && --count);
> -
> -	if (!(status & PCI_VPD_ADDR_F))
> -		return -ETIMEDOUT;
> -
> -	ret = pci_read_config_dword(pdev, cap + PCI_VPD_DATA, &value);
> -	if (ret < 0)
> -		return ret;
> -
> -	*val = cpu_to_le32(value);
> -
> -	return 0;

Ahh, just PCI VPD.

IMHO the above shouldn't hurt anyone, in theory. You only write to
VPD_ADDR, and to change actual VPD data (i.e., EEPROM), you need to
write to VPD_DATA.

Anyone should be allowed to do that even for unknown PCI devices
without a problem.

> -static void rtl_init_mac_address(struct rtl8169_private *tp,

> -	if (!(cfg1  & VPD)) {
> -		if (netif_msg_probe(tp))
> -			dev_info(&pdev->dev, "VPD access disabled, enabling\n");
> -		RTL_W8(Cfg9346, Cfg9346_Unlock);
> -		RTL_W8(Config1, cfg1 | VPD);
> -		RTL_W8(Cfg9346, Cfg9346_Lock);

Now I wonder what do they say the above does exactly.
Unfortunately the docs don't seem to be public.

> -	 * MAC address is stored in EEPROM at offset 0x0e
> -	 * Realtek says: "The VPD address does not have to be a DWORD-aligned
> -	 * address as defined in the PCI 2.2 Specifications, but the VPD data
> -	 * is always consecutive 4-byte data starting from the VPD address
> -	 * specified."

Nice.

> -	if (netif_msg_probe(tp)) {
> -		DECLARE_MAC_BUF(buf);
> -
> -		dev_info(&pdev->dev, "MAC address found in EEPROM: %s\n",
> -			 print_mac(buf, mac));
> -	}
> -
> -	if (is_valid_ether_addr(mac))
> -		rtl_rar_set(tp, mac);
> -}

No RTL_W8(Config1, cfg1 | ~VPD) to disable (perhaps R/W) access?

Though obviously first reading a good address from the EEPROM and then
erasing first 32 bits is a different story. I wonder if changing the
MAC address by hand works (using ifconfig, to arbitrary address).

-- 
Krzysztof Halasa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ