linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCHv3] printk: add %pM format specifier for MAC addresses

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 27 Oct 2008 16:55:56 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	harvey.harrison@...il.com
Cc:	johannes@...solutions.net, anders@...uras.de,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCHv3] printk: add %pM format specifier for MAC
 addresses

From: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 16:14:14 -0700

> Did you happen to have a preference with regard to the specifier for
> IPv6 addresses:
> 
> I was thinking of using %pI6 to replace NIP6() and NIP6_FMT and using
> %#pI6 for NIP6_SEQFMT.
> 
> On the IPv4 side, maybe use %pI4 for network endian NIPQUAD() and NIPQUAD_FMT
> and then %#pI4 for host-endian HIQUAD(), as displaying the IPv4 address without
> the periods isn't useful?
> 
> What do you think of that?

I'm ok with the '#' modifier but remind me again what's wrong with
using plain %p4 and %p6?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/