[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1225101688.15777.6.camel@localhost>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 11:01:28 +0100
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL/RESEND] kernel message catalog patches
On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 12:12 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Oct 2008, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> > > But if it's in-kernel, other people are then going to complain about them
> > > not being maintained. And quite frankly, I'm neither willing nor
> > > interested in hearing those complaints or making them more "valid".
> >
> > The usual answer to complaints of this sort is "send a patch", isn't it?
>
> Yes. And why don't you do all that, and not involve me at all, and keep
> all of this entirely out of the kernel?
Ok, understood. Not that the reaction surprises me, seems like nobody
likes documentation (including me). What I will do is to replace the
kmsg_xxx macros with the pr_xxx macros in the device drivers patches and
request the pull as a cleanup for 2.6.29. The out-of-tree kmsg patches
will then play tricks with pr_xxx analog to dev_xxx. That way the patch
should be minimal.
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists