| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1225182356.15745.2.camel@localhost> Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 09:25:56 +0100 From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com> To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [GIT PULL/RESEND] kernel message catalog patches On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 09:27 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > As I said a few months ago, please make it "almost kernel-doc style" > but something that can be distinguished from the current kernel-doc. > They aren't quite the same thing AFAICT. The current format is this: /*? * Tag: <component>.<hash> * Text: "<kmsg message text>" * Severity: <severity> * Parameter: * @1: <description of the first message parameter> * @2: <description of the second message parameter> * ... * Description: * <What is the kmsg message all about> * User action: * <What can the user do to fix the problem> */ See the "/*?" vs "/**" ? The kmsg comments are kernel-doc style but not the same as kernel-doc. -- blue skies, Martin. "Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists