[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081028084255.GM15734@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 09:42:55 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Yasunori Goto <y-goto@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: remove wrong -1 in calling init_memory_mapping
* Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
> From: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
>
> impact: make memory hot plug got last page mapped.
>
> Shuahua Li found:
> Round up address to a page, otherwise the last page isn't mapped.
>
> No, I just did some experiments on a desktop for memory hotplug and this bug
> triggered a crash in my test.
> Yinghai's suggestion also fixed the bug. I just want to have safer method. Anyway, either approach is ok to me.
>
> So acctually we don't need to round it.
> just remove that extra -1
>
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai <yinghai@...nel.org>
applied to tip/x86/urgent, thanks guys!
Note, i changed the "Impact:" line. We try to use it to provide a
single-line description of what practical impact a patch has. For
example if it's a bugfix, we try to describe what type of bug effect
it fixes. If it's a cleanup, we mark it as a cleanup. If it introduces
a new feature or changes existing behavior to improve the code, we
describe that.
There's no hard rules, so here are a few common examples:
Impact: fix crash with memory hotplug
Impact: cleanup
Impact: fix bootup crash on certain types of hardware
Impact: improve printk output
Impact: add (default-off) debug feature
Impact: make the implementation faster
Impact: cleanup (no object code changed)
Impact: change the implementation to be more robust
Impact: fix bootup hang on certain systems
Impact: add new system call
Impact: enable hardware feature and make use of it
Impact: fix rare crash under high DB load
etc. etc.
"Wrong" impact lines are the ones which just describe the change
itself, not the general impact:
Impact: add +1 to condition
Impact: change foo() to call bar() as well
Impact: flush the TLB when tearing down a mapping
Impact: check for NULL
these are less useful because they just duplicate the information
already available in the patch itself.
Ingo
----------------->
>From 60817c9b31ef7897d60bca2f384cbc316a3fdd8b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 13:03:18 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] x86, memory hotplug: remove wrong -1 in calling init_memory_mapping()
Impact: fix crash with memory hotplug
Shuahua Li found:
| I just did some experiments on a desktop for memory hotplug and this bug
| triggered a crash in my test.
|
| Yinghai's suggestion also fixed the bug.
We don't need to round it, just remove that extra -1
Signed-off-by: Yinghai <yinghai@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
---
arch/x86/mm/init_64.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
index c7a4c5a..f79a02f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
@@ -837,7 +837,7 @@ int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
unsigned long nr_pages = size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
int ret;
- last_mapped_pfn = init_memory_mapping(start, start + size-1);
+ last_mapped_pfn = init_memory_mapping(start, start + size);
if (last_mapped_pfn > max_pfn_mapped)
max_pfn_mapped = last_mapped_pfn;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists