linux-kernel - [Regulator RFC] da903x: Where should usb charge pump support go?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:18:24 +0000
From:	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@....ac.uk>
To:	eric miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com>, Liam Girdwood <lrg@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [Regulator RFC] da903x: Where should usb charge pump support go?

Dear All,

The new da903x driver is proving to be a good replacement for the out of kernel
driver I've been using previously.

Unfortunately there is still quite a lot of functionality to to add.

The key one for me is control of the USB charge pump. So the question is, does
this fit within the regulator framework (i.e. should I add it to the regulator
driver) or should this be a seperate driver (and if so where?)

Personally I'm not convinced it fits cleanly within the regulator framework
given it is probably only ever going to get called from one driver and has
somewhat odd properties!

Thanks,

Jonathan Cameron

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/