linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] da903x regulator bug fix

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f17812d70810280521g7cbf53b6kda2e7a1f7eef4de7@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 28 Oct 2008 20:21:57 +0800
From:	"Eric Miao" <eric.y.miao@...il.com>
To:	"Liam Girdwood" <lrg@...nel.org>
Cc:	"Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@....ac.uk>,
	"Jonathan Cameron" <Jonathan.Cameron@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] da903x regulator bug fix

On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 7:19 PM, Liam Girdwood <lrg@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 11:03 +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>> Changes the device registration part of the probe function to supply the
>> regulator device rather than its parent (the mfd device) as this caused
>> problems when the regulator core attempted to find constraints associated
>> with the regulators.
>>
>> Signed-of-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@....ac.uk>
>
> Thanks, this is more preferable than the first patch. I would ultimately
> prefer this regulator to be more like wm8350 in terms of mfd
> registration but we are in rc2 so this will have to wait.
>
> Eric, would you like to Ack ?
>

Yeah, I'm fine with this.

Acked-by: Eric Miao <eric.miao@...vell.com>

> Thanks
>
> Liam
>
>
>



-- 
Cheers
- eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/