linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] da903x regulator bug fix

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f17812d70810271801t47830712h431df82baee11654@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 28 Oct 2008 09:01:52 +0800
From:	"Eric Miao" <eric.y.miao@...il.com>
To:	"Jonathan Cameron" <Jonathan.Cameron@...il.com>
Cc:	"Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@....ac.uk>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Liam Girdwood" <lg@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] da903x regulator bug fix

I'd suggest making this a static inline function then,
e.g. to_da903x_dev(rdev), which will help both
readability and future modifications.

On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:29 PM, Jonathan Cameron
<Jonathan.Cameron@...il.com> wrote:
> Changes the device registration part of the probe function to supply the
> regulator device rather than its parent (the mfd device) as this caused
> problems when the regulator core attempted to find constraints associated
> with the regulators.
>
> Signed-of-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@....ac.uk>
>
> --
> This is quickest and simplest way to fix this bug. There may be better
> ways of doing it, but they all require considerably more substantial
> changes to the driver.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/da903x.c b/drivers/regulator/da903x.c
> index 3688e33..f928aa1 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/da903x.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/da903x.c
> @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ static int da903x_set_ldo_voltage(struct regulator_dev
> *rdev,
>                   int min_uV, int max_uV)
>  {
>     struct da903x_regulator_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
> -    struct device *da9034_dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev)->parent;
> +    struct device *da9034_dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev)->parent->parent;
>     uint8_t val, mask;
>
>     if (check_range(info, min_uV, max_uV)) {
> @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ static int da903x_set_ldo_voltage(struct
> regulator_dev *rdev,
>  static int da903x_get_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
>  {
>     struct da903x_regulator_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
> -    struct device *da9034_dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev)->parent;
> +    struct device *da9034_dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev)->parent->parent;
>     uint8_t val, mask;
>     int ret;
>
> @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ static int da903x_get_voltage(struct regulator_dev
> *rdev)
>  static int da903x_enable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
>  {
>     struct da903x_regulator_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
> -    struct device *da9034_dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev)->parent;
> +    struct device *da9034_dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev)->parent->parent;
>
>     return da903x_set_bits(da9034_dev, info->enable_reg,
>                     1 << info->enable_bit);
> @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ static int da903x_enable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
>  static int da903x_disable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
>  {
>     struct da903x_regulator_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
> -    struct device *da9034_dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev)->parent;
> +    struct device *da9034_dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev)->parent->parent;
>
>     return da903x_clr_bits(da9034_dev, info->enable_reg,
>                     1 << info->enable_bit);
> @@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ static int da903x_disable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
>  static int da903x_is_enabled(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
>  {
>     struct da903x_regulator_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
> -    struct device *da9034_dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev)->parent;
> +    struct device *da9034_dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev)->parent->parent;
>     uint8_t reg_val;
>     int ret;
>
> @@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ static int da9034_set_dvc_voltage(struct
> regulator_dev *rdev,
>                   int min_uV, int max_uV)
>  {
>     struct da903x_regulator_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
> -    struct device *da9034_dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev)->parent;
> +    struct device *da9034_dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev)->parent->parent;
>     uint8_t val, mask;
>     int ret;
>
> @@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ static int da9034_set_ldo12_voltage(struct
> regulator_dev *rdev,
>                     int min_uV, int max_uV)
>  {
>     struct da903x_regulator_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
> -    struct device *da9034_dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev)->parent;
> +    struct device *da9034_dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev)->parent->parent;
>     uint8_t val, mask;
>
>     if (check_range(info, min_uV, max_uV)) {
> @@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ static int da9034_set_ldo12_voltage(struct
> regulator_dev *rdev,
>  static int da9034_get_ldo12_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
>  {
>     struct da903x_regulator_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
> -    struct device *da9034_dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev)->parent;
> +    struct device *da9034_dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev)->parent->parent;
>     uint8_t val, mask;
>     int ret;
>
> @@ -466,7 +466,7 @@ static int __devinit da903x_regulator_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev)
>     if (ri->desc.id == DA9030_ID_LDO1 || ri->desc.id == DA9030_ID_LDO15)
>         ri->desc.ops = &da9030_regulator_ldo1_15_ops;
>
> -    rdev = regulator_register(&ri->desc, pdev->dev.parent, ri);
> +    rdev = regulator_register(&ri->desc, &pdev->dev, ri);
>     if (IS_ERR(rdev)) {
>         dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to register regulator %s\n",
>                 ri->desc.name);
>
>
>
>
>



-- 
Cheers
- eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/