[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49074A02.4080703@colorfullife.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:21:06 +0100
From: Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cl@...ux-foundation.org,
mingo@...e.hu, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, dipankar@...ibm.com,
josht@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, schamp@....com, niv@...ibm.com,
dvhltc@...ibm.com, ego@...ibm.com, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, peterz@...radead.org, penberg@...helsinki.fi,
andi@...stfloor.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] v7 scalable classic RCU implementation
Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>> How do you intend to handle nohz cpus?
>>
>
> In which variant of RCU? My current thought is to apply the rcutree.c
> version to rcupreempt.c. If rcuclassic.c can be dropped, my thought
> would be to leave it alone -- it is unnecessarily awakening CPUs, but
> this is a non-fatal issue.
>
>
For rcuclassic.
As far as I can see, rcuclassic treats nohz cpus as always outside
rcu_read_lock():
rcu_start_batch() contains
>
> cpus_andnot(rcp->cpumask, cpu_online_map, nohz_cpu_mask);
>
As soon as all cpus from rcp->cpumask reported a grace period, the
callbacks are called.
That a bug, therefore I would drop rcuclassic as soon as rcutree is merged.
--
Manfred
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists