[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1225234513-3996-1-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 20:55:13 -0200
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, avi@...hat.com, aliguori@...emonkey.ws,
npiggin@...e.de, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Krzysztof Helt <krzysztof.h1@...zta.fm>
Subject: [PATCH] regression: vmalloc easily fail.
Commit db64fe02258f1507e13fe5212a989922323685ce broke
KVM (the symptom) for me. The cause is that vmalloc
allocations fail, despite of the fact that /proc/meminfo
shows plenty of vmalloc space available.
After some investigation, it seems to me that the current
way to compute the next addr in the rb-tree transversal
leaves a spare page between each allocation. After a few
allocations, regardless of their size, we run out of vmalloc
space.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@...hat.com>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Helt <krzysztof.h1@...zta.fm>
---
mm/vmalloc.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index 0365369..a33b0d1 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ retry:
}
while (addr + size >= first->va_start && addr + size <= vend) {
- addr = ALIGN(first->va_end + PAGE_SIZE, align);
+ addr = ALIGN(first->va_end, align);
n = rb_next(&first->rb_node);
if (n)
--
1.5.6.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists