[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1KuwTn-0006EQ-8J@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 22:51:59 +0100
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: ncunningham@...a.org.au
CC: miklos@...redi.hu, rjw@...k.pl,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] Freezer: Don't count threads waiting for frozen
filesystems.
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > However it does not fix the freezing of tasks which are waiting for
> > VFS locks (i.e. inode->i_mutex) held by the outstanding fuse requests.
> > This is the tricky part...
>
> Convert them all to wait_event_freezeable.
You mean convert mutexes to event queues? Not a very good idea.
I fear we are going down the same path as the last time. I still
don't think rewriting the VFS is the right solution to the freezing
problem. But hey, if you want, sumbit a patch or an RFD and lets see
what others think.
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists