[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1225170338.5269.127.camel@localhost>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 22:05:38 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/5] net/ipv4, net/ipv6: use %#p6, %p6 format
strings
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 21:05 -0700, Harvey Harrison wrote:
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> index eea9542..113c4d9 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> @@ -2986,9 +2986,8 @@ static void if6_seq_stop(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
> static int if6_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
> {
> struct inet6_ifaddr *ifp = (struct inet6_ifaddr *)v;
> - seq_printf(seq,
> - NIP6_SEQFMT " %02x %02x %02x %02x %8s\n",
> - NIP6(ifp->addr),
> + seq_printf(seq, "%#p6 %02x %02x %02x %02x %8s\n",
> + &ifp->addr,
> ifp->idev->dev->ifindex,
> ifp->prefix_len,
> ifp->scope,
Is it really necessary to change the formats and arguments?
Perhaps it's enough to change the defines to:
#define NIP6_FMT "%6p"
#define NIP6_SEQFMT "%#6p"
#define NIP6(addr) &(addr)
If not, I think the NIP6 and NIP6_SEQFMT should be
separate patchsets for ease of verification.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists