| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <386072610810290301g564aa303nadb60c06155806be@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:01:56 +0800 From: "Bryan Wu" <cooloney@...nel.org> To: "Folkert van Heusden" <folkert@...heusden.com> Cc: "Kay Sievers" <kay.sievers@...y.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.6.26] kobject_add_internal failed for 2:0 with -EEXIST / unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference in sysfs_create_link On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Folkert van Heusden <folkert@...heusden.com> wrote: >> > While running my http://vanheusden.com/pyk/ script (which randomly >> > inserts and removes modules) I triggered the folllowing oops in a 2.6.26 >> > kernel on an IBM xSeries 260. This oops (in fact no oops at all) did not >> > get triggered in a 2.6.18 kernel on that system. >> > >> > [ 42.507375] FDC 0 is a National Semiconductor PC87306 >> > [ 42.509057] kobject_add_internal failed for 2:0 with -EEXIST, don't try to register things with the same name in the same directory. >> > [ 42.509291] Pid: 5301, comm: modprobe Not tainted 2.6.26-1-amd64 #1 >> > [ 42.509431] >> > [ 42.509433] Call Trace: >> > [ 42.509685] [<ffffffff8031b031>] kobject_add_internal+0x13f/0x17e >> > [ 42.509823] [<ffffffff8031b46e>] kobject_add+0x74/0x7c >> > [ 42.509969] [<ffffffff802e2470>] sysfs_addrm_finish+0x19/0x1ea >> > [ 42.510141] [<ffffffff802e21b4>] sysfs_find_dirent+0x1b/0x2f >> > [ 42.510331] [<ffffffff802e2741>] create_dir+0x5a/0x87 >> > [ 42.510466] [<ffffffff8031ae88>] kobject_get+0x12/0x17 >> > [ 42.510614] [<ffffffff80382771>] get_device+0x17/0x20 >> > [ 42.510754] [<ffffffff80382d81>] device_add+0x9b/0x53f >> > [ 42.510915] [<ffffffff8031acf2>] kobject_init+0x41/0x69 >> > [ 42.511374] [<ffffffff803832d1>] device_create_vargs+0x9a/0xc6 >> > [ 42.511519] [<ffffffff8027d23b>] bdi_register+0x57/0xb4 >> >> Looks like bdi sees two devices with the same devnum, or didn't >> cleanup an old entry. >> What does: ls -l "/sys/class/bdi/" print? > > The following: > folkert@...iantesthw:~$ ls -l /sys/class/bdi/ > total 0 > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 2008-10-28 18:32 1:0 > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 2008-10-28 18:32 1:1 > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 2008-10-28 18:32 1:10 > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 2008-10-28 18:32 1:11 > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 2008-10-28 18:32 1:12 > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 2008-10-28 18:32 1:13 > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 2008-10-28 18:32 1:14 > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 2008-10-28 18:32 1:15 > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 2008-10-28 18:32 1:2 > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 2008-10-28 18:32 1:3 > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 2008-10-28 18:32 1:4 > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 2008-10-28 18:32 1:5 > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 2008-10-28 18:32 1:6 > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 2008-10-28 18:32 1:7 > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 2008-10-28 18:32 1:8 > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 2008-10-28 18:32 1:9 > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 2008-10-28 18:32 2:0 > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 2008-10-28 18:32 2:1 > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 2008-10-28 18:32 254:0 > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 2008-10-28 18:32 254:1 > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 2008-10-28 18:32 254:2 > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 2008-10-28 18:32 254:3 > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 2008-10-28 18:32 254:4 > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 2008-10-28 18:32 254:5 > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 2008-10-28 18:32 3:0 > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 2008-10-29 11:39 7:0 > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 2008-10-29 11:39 7:1 > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 2008-10-29 11:39 7:2 > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 2008-10-29 11:39 7:3 > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 2008-10-29 11:39 7:4 > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 2008-10-29 11:39 7:5 > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 2008-10-29 11:39 7:6 > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 2008-10-29 11:39 7:7 > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 2008-10-28 18:32 8:0 > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 2008-10-28 18:32 default > >> How many floppies (or emulated floppies) does this system have? > > 1 physical. > > Hi guys, I found similar issue on Blackfin board and I believe it is a common bug for bdi http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/16/126 But there is no response about this bug, although I am working on it. -Bryan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists