| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 07:08:24 -0700 From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Glauber Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Fix CONFIG_PCI=n compile failure On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 09:01:46 -0500 James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com> wrote: > This is obviously some strange definition of the word "right" of > which I was previously unaware. That patch moves forbid_dac plus a > load of quirk processing (also for a PCI bus) out from under > CONFIG_PCI only ... which will fix the compile error, sure. > > However, if you'd be so kind, please explain how a DAC (meaning Dual > Addressing Cycle on the PCI bus) is useful (or even can be effected) > without a PCI bus? > > All its really doing is contaminating pci-dma.c with clutter that only > needs to be there because someone can't get the separation right.o > why do you even want that file for CONFIG_PCI=n ?? -- Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists