linux-kernel - Re: potential regression in ext[34] call to __page

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:40:14 -0400
From:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To:	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Cc:	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...il.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Kirill Korotaev <dev@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: potential regression in ext[34] call to __page_symlink()?

On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 04:25:57AM +0100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> 
> I was leaning towards adding a new AOP_FLAG_ there, usable just by
> filesystem code, and just to tell any helper code to clear __GFP_FS.
> That way callers won't get confused into thinking they can do
> GFP_ATOMIC writes from interrupt context or something ;) (which,
> trust me, somebody will attempt to do if it looks remotely feasible!)

Good point!!

						- Ted

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/