linux-kernel - [PATCH] Add option to passively listen for PCIE hotplug events

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20081029200903.GA1678@srcf.ucam.org>
Date:	Wed, 29 Oct 2008 20:09:03 +0000
From:	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To:	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	kristen.c.accardi@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] Add option to passively listen for PCIE hotplug events

Various pieces of hardware (such as the Acer Aspire One and Asus EEE) 
use PCIE hotplug to change the state of devices in response to events 
such as the removal of SD cards or disabling the wireless radio. 
However, they do not provide firmware support for this. As a consequence 
pciehp will refuse to load and various things break.

The existing workaround has been to use the pciehp_force option. This is 
undesirable as there is little guarantee that manipulating the power 
file in the slot directory will actually result in anything happening, 
leading to potential user confusion and hardware damage. This patch adds 
a new option, pciehp_passive. In this configuration pciehp will listen 
for events and notify the PCI core appropriately. However, it will not 
provide any user controllable sysfs attributes and so the risk of 
confusion or damage is averted. Any system slots that do have firmware 
support will continue to provide full functionality.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>

---

diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_core.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_core.c
index 4b23bc3..b878432 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_core.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_core.c
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ int pciehp_debug;
 int pciehp_poll_mode;
 int pciehp_poll_time;
 int pciehp_force;
+int pciehp_passive;
 struct workqueue_struct *pciehp_wq;
 
 #define DRIVER_VERSION	"0.4"
@@ -55,10 +56,12 @@ module_param(pciehp_debug, bool, 0644);
 module_param(pciehp_poll_mode, bool, 0644);
 module_param(pciehp_poll_time, int, 0644);
 module_param(pciehp_force, bool, 0644);
+module_param(pciehp_passive, bool, 0644);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(pciehp_debug, "Debugging mode enabled or not");
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(pciehp_poll_mode, "Using polling mechanism for hot-plug events or not");
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(pciehp_poll_time, "Polling mechanism frequency, in seconds");
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(pciehp_force, "Force pciehp, even if _OSC and OSHP are missing");
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(pciehp_passive, "Listen for pciehp events, even if _OSC and OSHP are missing");
 
 #define PCIE_MODULE_NAME "pciehp"
 
@@ -85,6 +88,13 @@ static struct hotplug_slot_ops pciehp_hotplug_slot_ops = {
   	.get_cur_bus_speed =	get_cur_bus_speed,
 };
 
+static struct hotplug_slot_ops pciehp_passive_hotplug_slot_ops = {
+	.owner =		THIS_MODULE,
+	.get_adapter_status =	get_adapter_status,
+  	.get_max_bus_speed =	get_max_bus_speed,
+  	.get_cur_bus_speed =	get_cur_bus_speed,
+};
+
 /*
  * Check the status of the Electro Mechanical Interlock (EMI)
  */
@@ -212,7 +222,11 @@ static int init_slots(struct controller *ctrl)
 		hotplug_slot->info = info;
 		hotplug_slot->private = slot;
 		hotplug_slot->release = &release_slot;
-		hotplug_slot->ops = &pciehp_hotplug_slot_ops;
+		if (pciehp_passive &&
+		    pciehp_get_hp_hw_control_from_firmware(ctrl->pci_dev))
+			hotplug_slot->ops = &pciehp_passive_hotplug_slot_ops;
+		else
+			hotplug_slot->ops = &pciehp_hotplug_slot_ops;
 		slot->hotplug_slot = hotplug_slot;
 		snprintf(name, SLOT_NAME_SIZE, "%u", slot->number);
 
@@ -407,7 +421,7 @@ static int pciehp_probe(struct pcie_device *dev, const struct pcie_port_service_
 	u8 value;
 	struct pci_dev *pdev = dev->port;
 
-	if (pciehp_force)
+	if (pciehp_force || pciehp_passive)
 		dev_info(&dev->device,
 			 "Bypassing BIOS check for pciehp use on %s\n",
 			 pci_name(pdev));
@@ -435,7 +449,7 @@ static int pciehp_probe(struct pcie_device *dev, const struct pcie_port_service_
 	t_slot = pciehp_find_slot(ctrl, ctrl->slot_device_offset);
 
 	t_slot->hpc_ops->get_adapter_status(t_slot, &value); /* Check if slot is occupied */
-	if (value && pciehp_force) {
+	if (value && (pciehp_force || pciehp_passive)) {
 		rc = pciehp_enable_slot(t_slot);
 		if (rc)	/* -ENODEV: shouldn't happen, but deal with it */
 			value = 0;
@@ -474,7 +488,7 @@ static int pciehp_suspend (struct pcie_device *dev, pm_message_t state)
 static int pciehp_resume (struct pcie_device *dev)
 {
 	dev_info(&dev->device, "%s ENTRY\n", __func__);
-	if (pciehp_force) {
+	if (pciehp_force || pciehp_passive) {
 		struct controller *ctrl = get_service_data(dev);
 		struct slot *t_slot;
 		u8 status;

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/