[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <21d7e9970810291440w50d15c30o961dad801cf71548@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 07:40:33 +1000
From: "Dave Airlie" <airlied@...il.com>
To: "Dave Jones" <davej@...hat.com>, "Dave Airlie" <airlied@...il.com>,
bob.montgomery@...com, "Yinghai Lu" <yinghai@...nel.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"vojtech@...e.cz" <vojtech@...e.cz>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"chandru@...ibm.com" <chandru@...ibm.com>,
"Joerg Roedel" <joerg.roedel@....com>,
"FUJITA Tomonori" <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
"Jesse Barnes" <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
"Pavel Machek" <pavel@....cz>, "Andi Kleen" <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] disable CPU side GART accesses
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 7:32 AM, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 07:24:34AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> > This stops the CPU from using the aperture for most DRI things. I
> > can't confirm this won't regress working systems
> > though. The whole AMD GART thing scares me, esp if some of the host
> > chipsets also have an AGP GART.
>
> The easy cop-out for those in the past has been 'dont support them'.
> It's why we removed some K8 chipset PCI IDs from the via driver for eg.
> iirc, if we leave them unprogrammed, they're essentially irrelevant.
>
I was more going the other way, why use the IOMMU for AGP when it has
other tasks to
do, and we have a host chipset GART.
Granted I've never had an AMD + AGP system to ever care about this.
Dave.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists