[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081029044155.GA7834@plankton.ifup.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 21:41:55 -0700
From: Brandon Philips <bphilips@...e.de>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
zhenyu.z.wang@...el.com, jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] intel-agp: Avoid oops for G33 on 1MB stolen case
On 14:52 Mon 20 Oct 2008, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 07:44:46 +1000
> Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com> wrote:
> > > + printk(KERN_WARNING PFX
> > > > + "Warning: G33 chipset
> > > > with 1MB"
> > > > + " allocated. Older X.org
> > > > Intel drivers"
> > > > + " will not work.\n");
> > > > + WARN_ON(1);
> > > > + }
> > > > gtt_entries = MB(1) - KB(size);
> > > > break;
> > > > case I855_GMCH_GMS_STOLEN_4M:
> > >
> > > Is the bug which this patch addresses present in the 2.6.27 kernel?
> > >
> >
> > I've been a bit wary about this patch, but on re-review I suppose it
> > should be fine. We'll just get WARN_ONs in places we don't really want
> > them, and I'm sure Arjan will come complaining about them from
> > kerneloops.
I figured it was better to be noisy than to have people complaining
about X.org being broken.
Should it be something other than a WARN?
> the patch is not so nice for this;
> the printk+WARN_ON() really should be using WARN() instead; that also
> allows me to filter these guys out easily if needed.
Ok. I will send a new patch in a moment using WARN().
Thanks,
Brandon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists