lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6599ad830810292359u6a2d0191ud235b866a73a7359@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 29 Oct 2008 23:59:02 -0700
From:	"Paul Menage" <menage@...gle.com>
To:	"David Rientjes" <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc:	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Christoph Lameter" <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Nick Piggin" <npiggin@...e.de>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@...radead.org>,
	"Derek Fults" <dfults@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 6/7] cpusets: per cpuset dirty ratios

On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 9:08 AM, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com> wrote:
> From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
>
> This implements dirty ratios per cpuset.  Two new files are added to the
> cpuset directories:

Wouldn't this be equally applicable to cgroups using the memory
controller rather than cpusets? Might it make sense to have a common
subsystem that could be used by either of them?

Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ