[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0810301349460.7072@wrl-59.cs.helsinki.fi>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:56:47 +0200 (EET)
From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 06/10] usbtmc: indent & braces disagree, something else is
desired
It seems that there's rather involved way to say something
which is commonly written in a plain simple form.
Some type changes would probably be necessary to get gcc
to do bitops instead of divide but it's no worse after my
change than before I think.
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
---
drivers/usb/class/usbtmc.c | 9 +++------
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/class/usbtmc.c b/drivers/usb/class/usbtmc.c
index 543811f..711a9fa 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/class/usbtmc.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/class/usbtmc.c
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/fs.h>
#include <linux/uaccess.h>
#include <linux/kref.h>
@@ -481,7 +482,6 @@ static ssize_t usbtmc_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *buf,
int retval;
int actual;
unsigned long int n_bytes;
- int n;
int remaining;
int done;
int this_part;
@@ -525,11 +525,8 @@ static ssize_t usbtmc_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *buf,
goto exit;
}
- n_bytes = 12 + this_part;
- if (this_part % 4)
- n_bytes += 4 - this_part % 4;
- for (n = 12 + this_part; n < n_bytes; n++)
- buffer[n] = 0;
+ n_bytes = roundup(12 + this_part, 4);
+ memset(buffer + 12 + this_part, 0, n_bytes - (12 + this_part));
retval = usb_bulk_msg(data->usb_dev,
usb_sndbulkpipe(data->usb_dev,
--
1.5.2.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists