linux-kernel - Re: how much license information inside the kernel ?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20081030142420.GA7157@logfs.org>
Date:	Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:24:20 +0100
From:	Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>
To:	devzero@....de
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: how much license information inside the kernel ?

On Thu, 30 October 2008 11:54:57 +0100, devzero@....de wrote:
> 
> i found that there is a LOT of repeating licensing information in the kernel.
> 
> for me, 
> 
> find ./linux-2.6.27 -type f -exec cat {} \; |egrep "free software|GNU General Public License|Free Software Foundation|version 2 of the License|distributed in the hope|WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY|FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR"
> 
> gives a file sized ~3.5M
> 
> That`s more than 1% of the kernel source.

Scary, isn't it?

One of the problems is that corporate lawyers require the full GPL
preample in any source file.  As a result, a lot of developers inside
companies cannot publish code without it.  Whether that makes any sense
is anyone's guess.  But it doesn't cause much harm either, so better
leave the bloat where it is.

Jörn

-- 
Time? What's that? Time is only worth what you do with it.
-- Theo de Raadt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/